Poornima Manco

Author

Blog

PLAGIARISM VS INSPIRATION

by

Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal.”
― T.S. Eliot

PLAGIARISM VS INSPIRATION

There is a fine line here. And most writers walk it fairly well. But when does inspiration trip into plagiarism. Is stealing ideas quite the same as stealing language? Outright plagiarism of course is completely contemptible, and easily identifiable too. Lifting a paragraph from somewhere, passing it off as your own,not crediting the author …and all that terribly mundane stuff that commonplace writers do. What is subtle, and impossible to pinpoint is the adroit lifting of ideas. After all, aren’t there meant to be only seven basic plots to begin with, and everything else is a permutation of these?

Good writing is always inspired writing. And inspiration can come from anywhere. There are times that I have read a story, been impressed with the style, and tried to experiment with my own in a similar vein.Yet, putting one’s own stamp on a piece of work, regardless of where the original idea came from, is the hallmark of a decent writer.

To think of all the movies, books and plays that have been inspired by Shakespeare. The ones that stand out a) credit the source material and b) soar beyond the source material, to connect to their audience at a very fundamental level. Vishal Bhardwaj, an Indian director, has transplanted Shakespeare’s tragedies, into the Indian milieux and context, with enormous success. His latest, “Haider”, has a dithering Hamlet like protagonist, unable to move beyond his father’s death, to connect with what is happening to his beloved Kashmir.

And then, of course, you have the satirical plagiarism. Nicki Minaj’s “Anaconda” being parodied by Sir-Mix-A-Lot, whose “Baby got back”, her song is inspired (!) by anyway. Convoluted? Yes. But what goes around, seems to come right back around.

Ultimately, let that which inspires you, be a springboard to your own creation. For it to truly become yours, it’s what you do with it that matters. If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then by all means imitate. But cloak it with your words, your unique tenor, and you may be on your way to having a halfway respectable piece of work to claim as your own.

(This blog post was inspired by another, more astute one!)

No No to the NaNo?

by

So, in a fit of misguided enthusiasm, I signed up for the NaNoWriMo. That being, the National Novel writing month. The immediate effect of that was that all inspiration mysteriously dried up. At 445 words, I walked slap bang into a writer’s block so large that it could dwarf Hadrian’s wall. Whither from here? Plug on, as my fellow writers exhort me to. Or abandon all pretence of beginning a novel (let alone completing one)!

Writing to demand has never been my forte. Despite having participated in various competitions, anytime I am given too strict a brief, or a topic not to my taste, I tend to find myself confronting the age old problem of having nothing to say. But the NaNo is not about having a readable novel at the end of the month. It is merely about getting those 50,000 words on paper regardless of whether they make sense or not. The subsequent edits are meant to remedy that. So, why am I not able to produce anything worthwhile?

Perhaps tackling the NaNo is a state of mind, and a state of preparation too. Using the eleven months that precede November to get a semblance of a plot, a structure and the characters in place. Come November, let it spew. That,very obviously, is not happening this year. I will take this as a learning experience though. Observe what my peers do, learn from their mistakes, and try not to beat myself up too much on my perceived failure.

Fortunately, I write as a hobby. Therefore I can allow myself the luxury of time. And of mistakes. I don’t see the NaNoWriMo as a mistake. I see it as something to aspire to. I am not there yet. But I hope I will be, given time….and some rope…

A body beautiful

by

Walking through the museum, I was struck by how fulsome the women appeared in the paintings. Their curvaceous bodies boasted rolls of fat, sweet little bellies, thighs that were broad and strong, breasts that were firm and ripe. They seemed neither ashamed, nor particularly concerned by their appearance. This, of course, was a painter’s perspective, and perhaps the women then were just as addled with insecurities, as they are now. However, for a very brief period, I was able to suspend all bodily angst, and gaze upon the beauty of the feminine form before norms and diktats started fashioning taste.

These were Renaissance painters who delighted in realism. Therefore, I must conclude, that the women they painted, were not too far removed from the women they saw in their everyday living. Compare that to the emaciated models that people the catwalks of Paris and Milan, and a strange dichotomy emerges. At what point did women stop looking like women in popular culture? When did having a BMI less than 18 constitute having the perfect figure?

I took my daughters along as I wanted them to be exposed to the Old Masters. See the interplay of light and shadows, observe the craftsmanship, the breathtaking talent of these amazing artists. Subliminally, however, I also wanted them to absorb the message that a woman’s body is a wondrous thing. It has the ability to create and sustain life within it. It is not merely a clothes horse. Having a thigh gap is by no means the apex of its achievement.

Sadly, as more young girls succumb to the lure of the fashion magazines, and to the peer pressure of having collar bones that could slice you in two, the incidence of anorexia and bulimia continue to rise.

As my ten year old looks down at the tiny swell of her stomach, and declares she needs to go on a diet, I have to turn my gaze inward, and ask myself, how much I am to blame as well. Every time I have sighed at a pair of trousers that don’t fit, or after a night of excess, vowed to rein it in. Every time I have rejected a dessert with a martyred air, what message have I relayed to my progeny? That denial is good? Virtuous even? That my being a size ten is more important than my being kind, intelligent, aware and grounded?

In examination of what constitutes beauty, I must examine not just what lies without, but also what lies within. An awareness, and a synergy of the two is perhaps the nearest realisation of a body beautiful.

Thought for the day

by

Apologies for the hiatus. A series of unfortunate events have kept me house bound and bed ridden for a while. What I have discovered in the meantime is that medicine, particularly that which knocks you out, isn’t quite the hotbed of creativity. My thoughts have been a jumble, and I have been unproductive on most fronts.

What I have been unable to escape from is the constant reports of the latest atrocities being committed by the IS. It has made me wonder how quickly we become desensitised to violence. Is this why it takes even more ghastly acts to call attention to a cause? How soon before we become completely inured? Before the beheading of innocents or the mass abduction of young girls is passé? How many more depths have to be plumbed before we can reach the nadir?

The time of innocence is a brief few years at the very beginning of life, and that too, if one is lucky. The rest of the time is a quick unravelling of that naiveté. The world’s underbelly is an ugly place. To protect our children however, we disabuse them of their guilelessness, fill their heads with monsters, real or imagined. Hoping against hope that cynicism, mistrust and circumstances will protect them from the worst.

And all the while we wait for the next horror to be unleashed, the next act of savage barbarity to dominate the headlines, while we scurry about our daily tasks, averting our eyes and pinching our nostrils, from the stink of moral turpitude that emanates off humanity.

Who am I?

by

The most rudimentary of questions. Yet the answer escapes most of us. Try and define yourself. Not describe, define. Who are you? Stripped down to the most elemental level. Are you brave? Are you a coward? Are you brutish or sophisticated? Are you conservative or liberal? Are you religious or an atheist? Who are you?

The answer is a complex one. And I’ll wager, not one you are expecting. The answer is: I do not know. I do not know how brave I am, till I am in a situation that requires courage. At that point, will I choose to save my skin or save another’s? I think I am sophisticated, till you put me in an unfamiliar milieu, and the social shorthand fails me. Then I appear brutish, unrefined and uncouth. I think I am liberal till my daughter brings home a boyfriend from the wrong side of the tracks, and all at once, every bit of my socialism flies out of the window. I think I am religious, yet I laugh at the barbaric rituals and stone gods of the ostensibly primitive.

Any of this sound familiar?

We are all complex, multi layered, multi dimensional wonders of evolution. We are all a work in progress. What I am in this moment, I will not be in the next. Nor will you. Our experiences, our joys, our sorrows contribute to our own unique signatures.

Fundamentally though, we all believe that we are good people. From the terrorist who bombs a hundred people in a square, giving up his life for a cause, to the politician who bombs a country, in pursuit of a higher good. We believe we are good. But are we?

These moral complexities are the shifting sands that govern human nature.

Who am I? The song from Les Misérables where Jean Valjean questions his moral core is perhaps the best way to end this rambling, philosophical blog post. Who am I? I am me.

 

Sharia

by

It is with growing horror and a deep sense of foreboding that I read about the re introduction of the Sharia law in the kingdom of Brunei. Sharia law, for those who are unfamiliar with it, is considered the infallible law of God in Islam. In its radical interpretation, music and dance are forbidden as are (very obviously) cigarettes and alcohol; there are medieval punishments for crimes like theft, and enforcement of attendance to regular prayer is brutal and swift. The introduction of Sharia has been a longstanding goal for many Islamist movements. Even as ISIS the breakaway extremist faction of the Al Qaeda, makes steady inroads into Iraq and neighbouring Syria, with an alarming speed, it is bringing these changes along in its wake.

Scarily, for the women in this part of the world, this will mean losing whatever little independence they had to begin with. Servility, subjugation, voicelessness, obedience and anonymity are bywords for the womenfolk under Sharia. In Brunei, where the plan is to introduce the law in three phases, the first will include fines and jail terms for unmarried women becoming pregnant. The second will incorporate punishments like whipping and amputations for alcohol consumption and theft. The third will be the imposition of stoning and death sentences for adultery, sodomy and murder. These punishments will apply not just to the locals but also to non-muslims.

It should come as no surprise that the judges, enforcers and authorities will primarily be male. Moderate Islamists have always understood and supported the role of women in society. How can a nation, a family, or a relationship thrive and prosper, if a significant proportion of the populace is metaphorically bound, gagged and blindfolded? Yet, in a return to the Dark ages, these laws aim to do just that. Women are seen as no more than baby making machines, with the added perk of being housemaids and nursemaids.

With a denial to basic freedom, to education and to any kind of joy in their lives, what kind of a future will emerge from these lands? For is it not the hand that rocks the cradle, that subliminally rules the world? If not in deed, then in desperation, there is bound to emerge a counter movement. One that will be spearheaded by brave souls like Malala Yousafzai. When that happens, and it will, it is women in the free world who must rise in support of our sisters. The time to be passive has long gone. What we are questioning and debating are not the tenets of a religious law, but our rights as humans to be accorded the respect and the dignity that should be the bedrock of all existence.

 

Image